Matteo Wong’s Atlantic piece on ChatGPT 5 acknowledges certain small limitations of the new version, but then pivots โ I’m going to be straightforward here โ to an absolutely mindless press release. Wong could not do more explicit salesmanship if he were paid by OpenAI. This echoes the non-journalism about machine learn that’s been dominating the NYT tech beat for some time. They all write like they’re trying to ingratiate themselves with our new insect overlords โ which I suppose they are.
Meanwhile, Kieran Healey actually used ChatGPT 5. Read his post and draw your own conclusions. The especially interesting point here is that ChatGPT has learned to sneer at anyone who points to its obvious errors.
My conclusion is this: No legacy-media journalist writes honestly and thoughtfully about the big AI companies. Not one. You have to seek the truth elsewhere.

Angusโs new photo for his LinkedIn pageย
The stories of Allan Dwan, one of the earliest American film directors.
Umberto Eco on the importance of editors:
Take the usually overlooked fact that the first version of a well-known poem by Philip Larkin originally went: โThey do you harm, your father and mother.โ It was only the insistence of Larkinโs editor that inspired the now famous variant. And the first draft of Eliotโs Waste Land opened: โApril is the cruelest month. And March isnโt all that great, either.โ Weakened in its impact by this peevish insistence on climactic details, the earlier text denied April any implied link with the rites of vegetation. As everyone knows, Ariosto at first submitted to his publisher a very brief poem that went: โOf women and knights, arms, loves, courtly rituals, and bold ventures I have nothing to say.โ And that was that. โHow about developing it a bit?โ the editor suggested. And Master Ludovico, who was having enough trouble as civil governor of a remote Tuscan province, said, โWhatโs the use? There are dozens of epics of chivalry already. Leave it. I want to urge poets to try new genres.โ And the editor replied, โYes, of course, I understand, and, personally, I agree with you. But why not try approaching the form from another angle? With irony, for instance. Anyway, we canโt sell a onepage book, particularly one with only two verses on the page. It looks like imitation Mallarmรฉ. It would have to be a limited, numbered edition. So unless we can get Philip Morris to sponsor it, weโre screwed.โ
Introducing study mode | OpenAI:
Today weโre introducing study mode in ChatGPT โ a learning experience that helps you work through problems step by step instead of just getting an answer. Starting today, itโs available to logged in users on Free, Plus, Pro, Team, with availability in ChatGPT Edu coming in the next few weeks.ย
So, a mode no one will ever use, then.ย
Anniversary night
Cal Newton’s distinction between additive and extractive technologies is fine, but Ursula Franklin made the same distinction long ago, using the terms holistic and prescriptive; ditto Ivan Illich, using the terms convivial and manipulatory. As I argue in this essay, we keep offering the same diagnoses without changing anyone’s behavior.

I married this wonderful life-giving life-preserving woman forty-five years ago today. The best thing that ever happened to me.ย

I remember quite vividly the day in 1974 when this showed up in the mail, a selection of the Science Fiction Book Club. It was my introduction to Le Guin and anarchism.ย