One of the most regular running jokes in my family, for many years now, is that I donโ€™t play Wii Boxing because I think itโ€™s too violent. We make a joke of my tender conscience, but I really do wince when a little Miiโ€™s head snaps back. I canโ€™t play for more than a couple of minutes. I pause the game; I switch to golf, or tennis, or frisbee. My discomfort is genuine, and deeper than any reasonable standard would deem appropriate, and (to me, anyway) not funny at all. The roots of it sink deep into my life; follow those roots 40ย years deep โ€” give or take a few days โ€” and eventually youโ€™ll find yourself in front of a little black-and-white television set, in Birmingham, Alabama, on the first day of October 1975. Three days earlier I had turned seventeen.
Instead of design, there is calculation: the more erratic the path, eccentric the loops, hidden the blueprint, the more efficient the exposure, inevitable the transaction. In this war, graphic designers are the great turncoats: where once signage promised to deliver you to where you wanted to be, it now obfuscates and entangles you in a thicket of cuteness that forces you past unwanted detours, turns you back when youโ€™re lost.
A wall covered in spines, shelved from floor to ceiling, recognises the correspondence between bricks and books.ย  It is the point at which knowledge becomes embedded in structure and the appearance is of books holding up the ceiling.ย  The implication is that enlightenment, the journey towards the sky or the sublime is available within these pages.ย  It is a metaphor made clearer by the special pieces of furniture, the chairs and stools which ingeniously convert to become ladders or in the sliding steps which glide along the floor scanning the shelves.ย  And just as bricks humanise the scale of even a vast wall by introducing an element of human scale โ€“ a solid unit designed to fit perfectly into the hand, so books define the space and give scale to even the largest the wall.ย  They are endlessly reproduced and faked in a game of trompe lโ€™oeil in which their symbolic role alone is invoked.ย  There are bookish wallpapers, there are rows of fake books spines, there are hidden jib doors hidden amongst the bookshelves which open, just as do books themselves to reveal another world and there are dealers who specialise in slightly-worn, leather-spined books by the yard, not for reading but for recreating a country house effect, the impression of history and wisdom.ย ย  ย Already in the 1st Century AD Seneca swore by a small library, for knowledge rather than vanity, not โ€˜endless bookshelves for the ignorant to decorate their dining rooms.โ€™

[gallery] Mike Joyce, from Print Process

[gallery columns=“1” size=“full” ids=“17611”]

nypl:

There are some swoon-worthy abstract motifs in our collections.

ย 

[Four abstract motifs.] via NYPL Digital Collections.

[gallery] Macintosh, at Print Process

Dialogue on Democracy, Part 4

There are many who consider as an injury to themselves any conduct which they have a distaste for, and resent it as an outrage to their feelings; as a religious bigot, when charged with disregarding the religious feelings of others, has been known to retort that they disregard his feelings, by persisting in their abominable worship or creed. But there is no parity between the feeling of a person for his own opinion, and the feeling of another who is offended at his holding it; no more than between the desire of a thief to take a purse, and the desire of the right owner to keep it. And a personโ€™s taste is as much his own peculiar concern as his opinion or his purse. It is easy for any one to imagine an ideal public, which leaves the freedom and choice of individuals in all uncertain matters undisturbed, and only requires them to abstain from modes of conduct which universal experience has condemned. But where has there been seen a public which set any such limit to its censorship? or when does the public trouble itself about universal experience? In its interferences with personal conduct it is seldom thinking of anything but the enormity of acting or feeling differently from itself; and this standard of judgment, thinly disguised, is held up to mankind as the dictate of religion and philosophy, by nine-tenths of all moralists and speculative writers. These teach that things are right because they are right; because we feel them to be so.
โ€œWould something be lost if autism were banished from the world? Probably. Autistic people have a unique way of looking at the world that lets them solve problems differently from everyone else, and we all benefit from that insight. On the other hand, everyone always gives the same example of this: Temple Grandin. Temple Grandin is pretty great. But I am not sure that her existence alone justifies all of the institutionalizations and seizures and head-banging and everything else.

Imagine if a demon offered civilization the following deal: โ€œOne in every hundred of your children will be born different. They will feel ordinary sensations as exquisite tortures. Many will never learn to speak; most will never work or have friends or live independently. More than half will consider suicide. Forty percent will be institutionalized, then ceaselessly tyrannized and abused until they die. In exchange, your slaughterhouses will be significantly more efficient.โ€

I feel like Screwtape would facepalm, then force him into remedial Not-Sounding-Like-An-Obvious-Demon classes.โ€