Brilliant essay by Mark Lilla on Julien Benda: “Our century will properly be called the century of the intellectual organization of political hatred. With this one sentence, we recognize Julien Benda as our contemporary. The hatreds he had in mind — racial, national, class-based — are once again our own. When Treason was written, street violence stoked by a hyper-partisan press was common between rival radical factions united only by their contempt for liberalism and parliamentary democracy.”
Kevin Kelly: “Security on a network is equivalent to pollution coming from a small source. If you pollute the river, you effect everyone’s drinking water. If your small device is hackable, everyone’s network is hackable. When the network is a big as the world, then my security depends on your security, and thus your security affects all security. Just as we collectively police the river for pollution so we, the commons, have a duty to regulate your security. Your security is all of our business.”
Samuel Johnson, from his “Life of Milton”:
It is told that in the art of education [Milton] performed wonders, and a formidable list is given of the authors, Greek and Latin, that were read in Aldersgate-street by youth between ten and fifteen or sixteen years of age. Those who tell or receive these stories should consider that nobody can be taught faster than he can learn. The speed of the horseman must be limited by the power of his horse. Every man that has ever undertaken to instruct others can tell what slow advances he has been able to make, and how much patience it requires to recall vagrant inattention, to stimulate sluggish indifference, and to rectify absurd misapprehension.
Finished reading: The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity by David Graeber and David Wengrow 📚
Currently reading: Stone Age Economics by Marshall Sahlins 📚
12 Get Back Moments You Need to Know to Act Like You Watched the Whole Thing — I mean, yeah, if you’re into the whole TL;DW thing. But the chief point of the film, as I see it, is the way that moments of brilliance can emerge unexpectedly from a miasma of boredom and tension.
My colleague Perry Glanzer is 100% correct:
The reality is, when it comes to faculty formation, the Christian mission is not a high priority at Baylor University, compared to other goals like becoming an elite “R1” research institution. Thus, although millions have been poured into helping Baylor become R1, there are no specific financial incentives to help faculty do Christian scholarship, learn more about Christian teaching (versus teaching and learning in general) or to encourage Christian service. Moreover, there is no clarity about what “Christian” even means at Baylor, despite the administration’s constant insistence that our school is “unambiguously Christian.”
David Brooks with a shrewd inquiry:
Donald Trump is the near-opposite of the Burkean conservatism I’ve described here. How did a movement built on sympathy and wisdom lead to a man who possesses neither? How did a movement that put such importance on the moral formation of the individual end up elevating an unashamed moral degenerate? How did a movement built on an image of society as a complex organism give rise to the simplistic dichotomies of manipulative populism? How did a movement based on respect for the wisdom of the past end up with Trump’s authoritarian campaign boast “I alone can fix it,” perhaps the least conservative sentence it is possible to utter?
Keep reading for his answers, which I think are spot-on.